K. Blake Vernon and Scott Ortman
2023-08-29
Can explain the behaviors that lead to agriculture.
Methodological challenges
CBSA Urban Core
CBSA analogy
CBSA Urban Core
Defined by the US Office of Management and Budget.
Kelsey Reese et al (2019) shows that focus should be on commute time!
Step 1: Identify community centers
A community center is a site containing some form of civic architecture or more households than could plausibly be related by kinship.
Step 2: Find nearest farms
‘Nearest’ here refers to least-cost or “commute” distance.
Step 3: Join neighboring community centers
For centers \(C_1\) and \(C_2\) with populations \(N_1 \leq N_2\), if \(pN_1\) are within distance \(D\) of \(C_2\), then \(C_1\) is a neighbor of \(C_2\).
Step 4: Calculate all travel paths
This step ensures communties are “concave” (short paths never leave the community) and helps to avoid unrealistic shapes.
Step 5: Draw community boundary
Uses GEOS ST_ConcaveHull
as implemented by sf
in R.
VEPII communities
Log Density: Low Medium High
VEPII demography - CMV
Log Density: Low Medium High
VEPII demography - NRG
Area never changes, just density.
WEAKNESSES | ||
1. | Lossy | method discretizes a continuous process |
2. | Narrow | boundaries are real, but only meaningful in specific contexts |
3. | Contingent | boundaries are identifiable, but only when connection between core and periphery is obvious |
STRENGTHS | ||
1. | Parsimonious | network structure based only on constraints of time and space |
2. | Grounded | justification owing to well-established geographic and statistical theory (namely, Tobler's Law) |
3. | Unoriginal | an analog to CBSA, provides a hybrid of density and distance based clustering algorithms |
4. | Fruitful | provides an empirical estimate of agricultural land area |
5. | Comparable | results may contribute to modern urban and economic geography |
6. | Concave | the shortest path between any two points in a community will never leave that community |